Session 202309221

Connecting with Probable Scenarios and Parallel Actions

Topics:

“Connecting with Probable Scenarios and Parallel Actions”
“Suggestibility”
“Self-Awareness Can Become Automatic”

Friday, September 22, 2023 (Private/Phone)

Participants: Mary (Michael) and Ben (Sumarian)

ELIAS: Good afternoon!

BEN: Hello, Elias. It's nice to be back.

ELIAS: And what shall we discuss?

BEN: Something that I was curious about: Yesterday I was meant to have a conversation with you, and I think a few seconds before I called Michael I felt a bit hot, I felt a bit sick, and then the session was postponed by Michael. I was wondering if it was just a matter of me feeling like I wasn't ready or I was connecting with somebody else's energy. Because I felt sick for a little bit, and that sickness disappeared as soon as the session was postponed to today.

ELIAS: I would say you weren't ready.

BEN: Huh! Okay, so today I'm ready. That was... So the symptoms that I created for myself were just a kind of communication that “I'll postpone this to another time.”

ELIAS: Yes.

BEN: Okay.

ELIAS: And after you had accomplished that, then there was no necessity for you to be feeling uncomfortable any longer.

BEN: That's a really quick change of physical feelings and body consciousness, instantaneously gone.

ELIAS: Yes.

BEN: Wow.

What I wanted to ask you is what has been going on in the last week, almost the entire week. It's been dissipating. I started having these imaginary scenarios in my head, very short scenarios, very violent ones, usually in response to viewing something on the street or interacting with somebody. And they would become very, very violent, and I would end up hurting people in those scenarios. And it could be triggered from anything. Even when I was alone, it was triggered from just imagining a conversation at work which I didn't like, or imagining running into somebody that does something to me that I didn't like, and I got very violent in these scenarios. I thought it was just connecting with mass energy, but that seems a bit general. Is there something more going on?

ELIAS: Actually, yes. It isn't connecting with mass energy. Actually what you've been doing is connecting with probable scenarios.

When you do that, sometimes it can feel so real. It is real, but it can feel so real to YOU that it actually feels as if you're actually DOING it, or that it could actually happen in the next moment. What is actually happening is that you are tapping into a probable scenario in which it IS happening.

BEN: Okay, so these probable scenarios are what, probable realities?

ELIAS: Yes.

BEN: Okay, I'm enacting very violent scenarios, so there must be some type of payoff because what was interesting is that I felt no emotional element in these actions. Even if I was almost killing somebody in that scenario, I really didn't feel any regret or fear or threat or anything.

ELIAS: That's understandable, because it's not you that's actually doing it; it's another probable you.

BEN: You know, some of these scenarios were so real, and some of them were triggered by actual events. Like I'm riding on the street and somebody comes and passes close to me, and it feels like if something would have happened in my reality it would have ended almost like in the scenario. Could it have been –

ELIAS: Precisely. And generally speaking, that’s what will, in a manner of speaking, trigger these types of awarenesses. Not always; sometimes you might have that awareness and nothing appears to trigger it, but most of the time it will be something in which you are paralleling partially – therefore you're in the same place at the same time, in the same scenario. Sometimes an individual will have this type of realization and see themself participating in a scenario in which they're driving in their vehicle and they engage a horrific crash. But they're not actually crashing, but it seems that they are.

In this, generally speaking when an individual has one of these types of realizations of a probable reality and a probable self is because you are generating a parallel action. Therefore you are in the same place at the same time and you are engaging the same action, except one of you does something different. And usually it does have to do with something violent and that's the reason it gains your attention, because it's deviating from what you're doing; therefore, the parallel then deviates in a capacity in which something violent happens that isn't happening in your reality.

BEN: Ohhh. So that's why the violent is more attractive. It gets my attention, and I can see that this is really different than what would normally happen because I never laid a hand on anyone. I'm not a violent person.

ELIAS: Correct.

BEN: So these scenarios actually occur in a probable reality?

ELIAS: Yes.

BEN: Wow.

ELIAS: And this gives you a glimpse into other realities, other probable selves, other probable realities that are occurring alongside of YOUR reality.

BEN: Does entertaining these scenarios actually release the energy from, or the likelihood of, some of these happening here in my reality?

ELIAS: No. It is actually simply a glimpse into a different reality. It doesn't affect your reality, because generally speaking, whatever the action is that's occurring in the other reality is something that you wouldn't choose in your reality.

BEN: Hm. Wow, that's interesting. And how am I accessing these probable scenarios? I would think through imagination – or is it in…?

ELIAS: That's one avenue, because that is an avenue of communication. And another avenue is simply through a visualization that can happen spontaneously. And in that, I would say that it is something that actually simply allows you to be objectively aware of other realities. And in that, it gives you actual evidence of other realities.

BEN: Okay. That was interesting. That was different than what I imagined it to be, but okay, that's great. (Elias chuckles) No, I thought that maybe I'm blocking some aggressive behavior or violent behavior, but that doesn't seem like me.

ELIAS: No. No, no, no.

BEN: Okay.

Something else that I wanted to ask you about: My brother's wife, who I asked a question for her a few sessions ago, they're going through this series of therapeutic sessions in this new type of technology, and I tried it myself here in Israel because I found a center. It's called scalar wave technology. You're in a room for several hours with some devices and some screens that emit all kinds of colorful photons. And the testimonials from her and from other people that have undergone that treatment are astonishing. People have reversed many things. People have changed. People have eliminated parts of their cancer. That's why I went to try it myself, and I was wondering, is there physical validity to the explanations that being in that room creates some influence on the body consciousness at a quantum level, maybe changing the cells’ electrical charge?

ELIAS: It can. It doesn't always, but it can.

BEN: And what would it depend on that it doesn't always?

ELIAS: What it depends on is the individual's openness to that being effective. Some people are very good at blocking.

BEN: So you're saying the devices are actually creating an effect but if you are open to receiving it. So it's not an entirely placebo "I believe that it works and therefore it does."

ELIAS: Well, that's a tricky question, my friend, because I would say to you that that is true and correct, that you believe something and therefore that will allow something to happen. In that, believing is trusting, and therefore if you trust something, you will allow it to happen, or you will make it happen. And in that, in actuality, NOTHING actually has power to affect you unless you allow it to. That doesn't mean that things don't have some innate qualities or powers in themselves; many things DO, but that doesn't mean that they can or will affect you unless you allow them to.

BEN: What is unique about this technology or the marketing of the technology that so many people are trusting enough to make such amazing changes to their bodies?

ELIAS: I would say that people in general are very suggestible. And in that, if something is set forth in a capacity that doesn't seem TOO fantastical but that is believable enough for many individuals, that would be enough to sway most. Because people believe other people; therefore, if someone is generating an effect with something, but not only one person but if many people are engaging a particular expression and they are generating a positive effect from it, that is convincing for many other individuals. People are more likely to accept what other people have experienced than simply believing some marketing ploy.

BEN: So the testimonials for the most part are actually correct for those people when they say that they have been cured from this or that.

ELIAS: They may or may not be. Some are, some aren't. And in that, the point is that if there are enough testimonials, it will entice people to try it.

BEN: Oh, but the results for those people would depend on whether they genuinely trusted; that's the bottom line.

ELIAS: Correct.

BEN: Was I trusting the two-hour session that I had? Because I did feel some affectingness, but I was also skeptical because I usually don't align with groups. So how trusting was I?

ELIAS: I would say moderately. I would say that you had some element of trust because you wanted to believe it.

BEN: Right.

ELIAS: Therefore, you generated some amount of trust – which, that's all that's necessary in actuality, because then you might not have a tremendous experience with something, but even if you have a slight experience, that will be enough to entice you to try it again.

BEN: Oh. That's good. That means there's variation in the level of trust and the outcome, but it's fine.

ELIAS: Yes!

BEN: Hm. I am curious in trying it again just for my own research, not because I have any illness that I want to, you know, do something about. Maybe that puts me in a better situation in which I'm not desperate and I need that treatment.

ELIAS: But it also puts you in a position in which then you have something that you might trust futurely if you DO create something physical.

BEN: Oh. And I think it's also an example of trust in general that once you trust something that it will work for you in varying degrees.

ELIAS: Yes!

BEN: Oh, so that IS important. So there is physical validity to the technology to some extent. There's very little documentation about what's going on there, but it is mentioning scalar waves and Nikola Tesla's discoveries. I assume for most people it's not important, the explanation.

ELIAS: Correct, but I would also agree with you, as I said: There are things that have properties in themselves and that have the ability to be affecting in themselves, but it's a matter of whether you allow that or not.

Just as, a very simple and obvious example would be the pandemic. There was – or is – an actual virus, and this is a collection of actual organisms, and in that, they actually do have innate properties in themselves – not necessarily to be poisoning, but that they don't agree with, or they're not compatible with, the human body. But in that, as a human you have to activate that; therefore, some people do and some people don't. But once again, you see how MANY people did and still are, and that has to do with suggestibility.

BEN: Wow. That's very powerful suggestibility. It's almost scary.

ELIAS: It IS very powerful.

BEN: Hm. All right. That's very interesting. I think I will continue to research that technology and get reports from my brother's wife, which is very interesting also.

ELIAS: Very well.

BEN: I have some other short questions. I get occasionally some tightness on my forearms’ skin. They feel a bit hot, they feel a bit tight. I think my energy changes in those moments, but I don't really understand in what manner. It's not a matter of hydration. It's something about either irritation or anxiety that creates this sensation, and I'm quite aware of it and then it disappears. What would be behind that?

ELIAS: I would say you are correct that it has to do with irritation and/or anxiety, and that generally speaking when you are aware of it, or when you become aware of it, then it will stop.

BEN: Okay. I have another question which may be a larger question, but I was talking to myself this week and I asked myself, “Where is that thin line between obsessively monitoring every action that you do and noticing and paying attention and the complete opposite, where you’re just totally ignorant and whatever goes, goes? How do you continue shifting without becoming obsessively monitoring everything you do?”

ELIAS: You don't have to obsessively monitor everything you do. All you have to do is be more aware of you, and in that, it becomes as automatic as NOT paying attention. In that, what happens is, you don't have to be monitoring yourself every moment, but when you begin to deviate and move in directions in which you are not expressing your greatest benefit, you'll notice.

Initially, it IS a matter of paying a lot of attention to yourself, because you're swinging the pendulum in the other direction, in a manner of speaking. You're so accustomed to expressing in relation to automatic pilot, so to speak, that moving in the direction of becoming more self-aware, you do somewhat for a time swing that pendulum in the other direction, and in that you become more hyperaware of yourself. But then it moves into a balance, and in the balance, you're already aware of yourself, you've already become accustomed to paying attention to what you're doing and to being aware of what is a benefit to you and what isn't, and then you don't have to be hyperaware of everything you're doing, because when you move in a direction of something that isn't beneficial to you, you'll know.

BEN: Okay.

ELIAS: Now, let's say that there is also then the next step, in which you are noticing your choices and paying attention to the choices that you're making and being able to look at them from the perspective of foresight rather than hindsight, and that does require you paying attention to what you're choosing. But that's not something that you necessarily do every moment either, but rather, occasionally you will pay attention to what you're choosing, and generally speaking it will be in relation to something that's important to you.

[The timer for the session rings]

And then you can use that foresight in relation to your choice and move in directions of choosing what is to your greatest benefit.

(Audio ends abruptly after 30 minutes)


Copyright 2023 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.