The Russian War on Ukraine
Topics:
"The Russian War on Ukraine"
“Support and Encouragement Ripples Out”
“Perceiving 'Enough' Creates Astounding Energy”
"Putin's End Goal"
“Military Forces Follow Orders”
“A Very Volatile Situation”
"The Mass Energy of Fear Versus Disabling Nuclear Weapons"
Tuesday, March 1, 2022 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael), Dan (Zynn) and Natasha (Nicole)
“I would encourage you in any direction and expression that expresses support and encouragement and help that you can, and in doing so, be certain of maintaining the perception that you are doing enough, because the more you move in that energy of enough, the stronger you lend energy to the country.”
(Audio begins partway through session)
NATASHA: You wanted to ask something about nuclear weapons and Ukraine and stuff.
DAN: Yes, okay. So, an idea in our teleportation group [is that] we managed to disable nuclear weapons around the globe. I don’t know how much I personally participated, but the idea [is] that we disabled. Is that real in most people’s realities, or is it in only in our reality, or only in Scotty’s reality?
ELIAS: This is somewhat tricky, because situations have altered. What I would say is, for a time you were successful, and that yes, you did neutralize that for a time. And I would say that that was very real, and it was in all of your realities.
I would say that that has changed, and let me express to you and explain that the reason that that changed is in relation to a shift in mass energy.
Now, let me express also, it’s not simply a shift in mass energy in relation to aggression but mostly in relation to fear, that there are masses – MASSES – of people that are actually very afraid – and not only in places such as Ukraine. No, more so, there are masses that are afraid in Russia, in Europe, even in your present country [U.S.A.]. And in that, unfortunately, masses of people feel safer if they HAVE these weapons of mass destruction, because they THINK – which is not entirely correct – but they think that if there are these weapons of mass destruction that are operational that the powers-that-be won’t use them, because they’re too destructive.
That isn’t necessarily actually true. The powers-that-be MIGHT use them, but they aren’t in a position to be using them at this present moment – but that doesn’t mean that they WOULDN’T use them.
What I am expressing is that with a surge of mass energy, that has altered what you disengaged. Therefore, it is not that you didn’t do it or that that wasn’t real; it was, but it’s been overridden at this present time framework by masses of energy in relation to people that are very much afraid of the possibilities of what is occurring presently.
DAN: Okay. Would it be a beneficial direction to attempt to neutralize it again sometime?
ELIAS: I would say (pause)… Actually, what I would say is, it might not necessarily be entirely successful, but that doesn’t mean that it wouldn’t be helpful. Therefore, if you want to move in that direction, and if people are supportive and they ARE inclined to express in that direction, then I would say I would encourage you.
I would encourage you, but also expressing realistically that you likely won’t be entirely successful in de-armament, and it wouldn’t necessarily neutralize those weapons, but it WILL lend a tremendous energy to moving in the direction of stabilizing and moving away from escalation in conflict.
DAN: Yeah. So you are probably aware how we often feel, right? Because (sighs) it’s really close to home, you know, especially for Natasha. I am surrounded by friends from Kyiv and Kharkov and other places there. It’s crazy, because I perceive that some Russians are brave and try to protest, but they are quickly arrested. I perceive that many are brainwashed.
But the idea that Ukraine was happily going about and maybe being in between United States and Russia or N.A.T.O. and Russia, caught up in those games – and yes, nobody creates nobody else’s reality – but from the official standpoint we were happily living, not touching anybody, and then boom. How to support it without fighting that battle? Because really in energy I want to support Ukraine. Ukraine is amazingly brave and just trying to not be destroyed, you know? It’s hard not to support. I want to support, but I don’t want to match, I guess, aggressive energy because that’s dangerous.
ELIAS: What I would say to you, my dear friends, is you’re already being supportive in relation to your energy and your intentions. I would say that whatever you do in a supportive and encouraging direction ripples out to the whole.
Therefore, it’s a matter of recognizing, just as with anything, you think that it’s not enough to be moving in a direction of being helpful to one or to do one action, but it is. It’s tremendously helpful, and I would remind you of that. Therefore, I would encourage you to engage whatever help you choose and that you can conceivably engage, and view it as enough. That is important, that you are actually genuinely perceiving whatever you do as enough.
DAN: Okay.
ELIAS: That lends such a tremendous amount of energy and strength that I would say it would be astounding to you.
DAN: Hm. Okay.
Briefly, what is Putin’s end goal? Is it true that his end goal is to reunify the empire, the Soviet Union, whatever the cost?
ELIAS: (Pause) I would say (pause) his end goal is (pause) to create a legacy for himself – which he is not actually doing – but in his perception, create a legacy for himself that he has restored Russia to ultimate greatness.
DAN: Hm. And he—
ELIAS: But his perception of greatness is somewhat skewed. And I would say realistically, unfortunately, his perception of greatness doesn’t include the genuine support of his people, because he isn’t actually considering his people.
And when I say “his people,” I mean that quite in the manner that I am saying it, because regardless of what he terms his position to be, what he has set himself in the direction and AS his position is not actually a president but more a king.
DAN: Yes. Yes.
ELIAS: And therefore in that, what he wants to restore is the idea of Russia in the time of the czars.
[A section of the recording is inaudible and has been deleted]
NATASHA: Yes, but he has been president of Russia for such a long time when he has been, I don’t know, chosen or not – or it was, you know, manipulated, but nevertheless he is there for more than twenty years.
ELIAS: I know.
NATASHA: And my point is, I understand that power for such a long time corrupts people. But people over there in Russia, I’m just curious, I mean how could those soldiers…? Even their young ones; they didn’t know the war. We didn’t know the war either, my generation. But still, how could these younger people go and fight with their brothers and sisters? I don’t understand why the army doesn’t stop. They are so much afraid of Putin, and I’m just curious, how widely is he supported, really? I understand that people fear him and he’s…
ELIAS: It’s not only that. I would say that, very much similar to any army, in order to incorporate an army, my friend, you have to move in a direction in what you recognize as ultimate control. In that, the people that are in the army, in the armed forces, let us say, they have been taught from the beginning to follow and not question.
NATASHA: Yeah, that’s true. That’s true.
ELIAS: That is their role. And in that, this is how military forces function, and how they maintain, is through that expression of ultimate control and ultimate compliance – without question, without discussion. Militaries are NOT democracies.
NATASHA: Yeah.
ELIAS: Militaries are dictatorships, and most of the people that are in the position of being involved with the military in your present timeframe do so voluntarily. Therefore, they are willingly moving in the direction of being indoctrinated, and that is precisely what they are experiencing, indoctrination, because it is necessary to maintain that organization.
Therefore, it is somewhat of a moot point or ludicrous to ask questions about why would the military move in these directions and be fighting with these people. Of COURSE they will! That is what they are taught to do, and that’s what they do: they follow orders.
NATASHA: Yeah. Okay.
DAN: But they may see that reality on the other side is different from what they were told, right? So to some extent, some of them may waver.
ELIAS: I would say that it is understandable that that’s what you want to believe. I understand that. I would say that no, they don’t necessarily see. They see what they are told to see.
NATASHA: Ah. Terrible. It’s terrible. I don’t get —
ELIAS: They SEE what they have been indoctrinated with. They are instructed that certain people are the enemy, therefore those people are the enemy, and it doesn’t matter. This holds for every – every – army, every military force. It doesn’t matter whether they are old or young or children or infants, they belong to a people that are designated as the enemy; therefore, they’re ALL the enemy.
NATASHA: Yeah. Okay.
DAN: But there is somewhat of a difference with the Ukrainian army, right? Because they are defending.
ELIAS: They ARE in the position of defending, and there is somewhat of a difference because the only ones that they are engaging are the military. They’re not engaging civilians in Russia.
NATASHA: Yes. Yes.
ELIAS: Therefore, there is somewhat of a difference, but they see the Russians as the enemy also. Therefore, the only difference is the location. They’re not in a position to be engaging civilians in Russia, for they aren’t presenting that to themself, but they are perceiving the Russian people as the enemy.
DAN: Yeah. It’s hard not to, when they came over to occupy.
ELIAS: Yes. Yes! I very much agree. And in that, this is the fortune of war, unfortunately, and this is the perception that pervades.
NATASHA: Yeah, but in — okay. {To Dan] You wanted to ask something then.
DAN: No, go ahead.
NATASHA: No, I just wanted to ask: I understand the situation is volatile, but what are the chances that it will end soon? And if it will end at all?
ELIAS: That, my dear friends, remains to be seen. I would say that at this point presently, it’s a very volatile situation. It isn’t in the direction of dissipating at this present moment. It doesn’t seem to be moving in that direction. It seems more to be moving in the direction of escalation, which is what they want, and therefore they’re following that – meaning the Russians. And in that, I would say that at this present time framework, it doesn’t [inaudible] moving in a direction of de-escalating.
NATASHA: Yeah. I see.
ELIAS: I would say that they are being somewhat careful and strategic. Now, I know that you might express contrary to that, but in actuality, they could have moved in and simply bombed all of the cities and taken over, and they didn’t. Therefore, they are moving somewhat slowly. They could have annihilated them, but they didn’t because if they had, they would have incurred consequences from many major other powers. Therefore, they’re being somewhat careful and strategic, but they are still moving in a direction of advancement. Rather than de-escalating, they are continuing to move in a direction of escalating.
But in that, I would say that the (pause) heads of the military, because it’s not only the king (chuckles) – and I shall be referring to him as that, because that is what he is – it’s not only the king; it’s also his advisors and his military leaders, and his military leaders are hungry for this [audio cut off]. They have been being promised this for a considerable time framework, and now they are engaging. And in that, I would say that they don’t much care yet what the [inaudible] is of other what you would term to be superpowers, because they perceive themselves to be right, and that it is not the concern of the rest of the world or the other superpowers because they perceive that this is land that belongs to them.
NATASHA: (Derisively) Ha!
ELIAS: I agree, it does not, but they perceive that it does. And therefore, they are not – at THIS point; now this could change, but at this point they are not concerned with the opinion of anyone else in the world, especially the other superpowers, because their perception is that it doesn’t concern them. (Pause) This is something that belongs to them that they are reclaiming, and that it should not be of any concern of any other nation. THAT is the decree of the king.
NATASHA: Uh-huh. Mm-hm. But I still—
ELIAS: Very similar to historical times with Britain and their perception that Scotland belonged to them; a very similar situation.
NATASHA: Okay, I hear you. I hear you.
ELIAS: Therefore, my dear friends, what I would say to you is, I would encourage you in any direction and expression that expresses support and encouragement and help that you can, and in doing so, be certain of maintaining the perception that you are doing enough, because the more you move in that energy of enough, the stronger you lend energy to the country.
DAN: Okay. And in our teleportation group, in addition to trying to disable, neutralize those weapons as much as possible, what other direction could be beneficial?
ELIAS: Precisely what I have expressed.
DAN: Okay. Just curiosity: When I think about Putin, I sometimes interact with him. I sometimes hit him on the head with stuff and you know, play in my imagination just to release the feelings. But when I do that, I feel some connection. Is that the empathic sense only, or is there some type of counterpart action or some kind of connection?
ELIAS: You do have a connection. It isn’t a counterpart action; it is shared [audio cut off]. But what I would also say to you, my friend, is actually this type of expression is actually beneficial, the reason being because it allows you to express energy that you perceive to be negative in a manner that is productive. It releases that energy without being destructive.
DAN: Yes, thank you. And when you replied the first part about connection, the line got interrupted. What is my connection to him?
ELIAS: You are not incorporating a counterpart action, but you have many other focuses with this individual.
DAN: Ah.
NATASHA: (Laughs) Wow.
ELIAS: And what I would say to you is, likely the reason that you express in the manner that you do in this fantasy is that in a more recent time framework to your present focus, you actually incorporate a focus with this individual as a younger brother that you actually (chuckles) DID hit on the head frequently. (Both laugh)
NATASHA: Wow. Wow! (DAN laughs)
ELIAS: Therefore I would say that likely you’re tapping into that energy in addition to whatever you are manifesting or fantasizing in this focus. (Both laugh)
NATASHA: Well, what about me? Do I have anything to do with him also in my other focuses?
ELIAS: Yes. You also have other focuses with this individual. He does have an [audio cut off] that incorporates many focuses that are somewhat antagonistic. (Natasha laughs) This is somewhat of a theme with him that he explores in this reality.
Now, in that, what I would say is, you do have a focus in the early 1900s with this individual in which you are his mother.
NATASHA: Oh my god. (Laughs) Because sometimes I feel like I want to suffocate him, literally suffocate him.
ELIAS: And [audio cut off] chase him around quite a bit.
NATASHA: Wow. (Both laugh)
(Audio ends after 33 minutes)
Copyright 2022 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.