Supportive Energy
Topics:
”Supportive Energy”
Tuesday, July 16, 2007 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael) and Jim S. (Bevan)
ELIAS: Good afternoon.
JIM: Well, good afternoon, Elias. Good to talk to you again.
ELIAS: And you also.
JIM: Was it you or our friend Patel who decided that our microwave oven should turn on whenever the oven door was opened?
ELIAS: (laughs) Not myself. Your impression would be correct.
JIM: (laughs) Patel, huh. (Elias laughs) Okay. He’s quite a joker.
ELIAS: Much more mischievous.
JIM: Right. Okay. Am I, by any chance, directing essence of Italian composer, Ottorino Respighi?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Yes. Fine. He aligns Sumari?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Soft orientation and religious focus?
ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.
JIM: His wife, Elsa, is a focus of Jene, J-E-N-E?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Aligns Sumari also?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Soft orientation and emotional focus?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: I get the impression of a deeply religious man. Was my discovery of Respighi meant to challenge my negative beliefs regarding religion?
ELIAS: Ha, Ha! You are correct.
JIM: When I listen to Respighi’s music, I get an impression, an association with Maria Capola. Are Maria and Respighi counterparts?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I feel that I am projecting energy strongly to Maria when listening to Respighi’s music. Am I?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I’d like very much for Maria and Dominic to succeed in whatever they are engaged in. Is that desire accomplishing anything with respect to them?
ELIAS: It is offering a supportive energy. Remember, you do not choose for the other individual, but it is generating a supportive energy which is influencing in a manner to allow the individual to experience more of their own strength.
JIM: Good, good. That’s what I would like to happen. One of the CD’s of Respighi’s music that I purchased has a performance of his ballet music for “Belkis, Queen of Sheba.” My emotional reaction both to the music and to the story behind the ballet, makes me think that Belkis, Queen of Sheba, may be another focus of Bevan. It would explain Respighi’s magnificent musical depiction. Am I Belkis, Queen of Sheba? When I mentioned the possibility, my wife said that she didn’t think that I looked like the Queen of Sheba.
ELIAS: (Laughs loudly) Grand observation. (Laughs along with Jim) I would express to you that you are observing of them.
JIM: Observing.
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Okay. I’m not sure if Belkis aligns Sumari or Zuli. I think Zuli. Am I right?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: She is soft orientation and emotional focus?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I feel that Millicent Letterly and Belkis are parallel counterparts. Are they?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: I met Millicent Letterly in my dreams, didn’t I?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: She prefers Millie to Millicent, doesn’t she?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: In spite of the nature of our dream meeting, I got the feeling that she was not nearly the shallow person that I assumed she was. I now feel that my label of nymphomaniac applied to only one aspect of her personality. Would you agree?
ELIAS: I would agree.
JIM: Was the purpose of my dream encounter with Millie to counter my association of her with the nymphomaniac label?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: My impression is that Millie could have served as a model for many of the women in my stories and perhaps she did. Has she assisted me in my writing?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Was Millie’s intent in experiencing physical life quite similar to my own?
ELIAS: Similar, yes.
JIM: I see her position on sexual matters to be similar to Muriel’s. Are they counterparts by any chance?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I believe that I met Thomas Beevan, not while dreaming, but while I lay in bed letting my mind drift. I saw him as a stocky man, not fat, but solidly built, crew cut white hair, blue eyes, square face and jaw. He wore an Elias-blue short-sleeved shirt and knee-length shorts of the same color. His expression seemed interested but detached and non-committal. Am I right in my impression that that was Thomas Beevan?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Was that your way of introducing him to me?
ELIAS: I was engaging also. Therefore, in a manner of speaking, yes.
JIM: I believe that he was aware of me as another focus of Bevan but not of my name or time/space. Was that the case?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Am I either directing or observing essence of Ralph Waldo Emerson?
ELIAS: Observing.
JIM: Observing. I thought probably. I get him belonging Sumafi and aligning Milumet. Am I right?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: He’s common orientation and thought focused?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: It was the mention of Emerson and quotes from his writing that brought him to mind in this time frame and I suspect that there is another scenario involved. Was that what prompted me to make a rare visit to our local library to see if I could borrow a book of Emerson’s writing?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Mary, a focus of Billeu, the librarian, was unable to find any of Emerson’s work among their books, but while she was searching, I managed to open up enough to give her the information that you had confirmed about her. Was she as pleased with that information as she seemed to be?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Did I make that visit in order to meet the individuals who were collecting library patron information? I wasn’t particularly impressed by them.
ELIAS: (laughs) But, it would be that you chose to offer yourself.
JIM: Uh huh. Mary is a person to whom I can talk about the sort of information that you present. Is that what I have in mind in reopening contact with her?
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes. Perhaps not entirely in thought, but in energy, yes.
JIM: In energy, okay. I’ve got Bessie Smith connected with essence Abduhl. Is she observed by that essence?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Is she a focus of Mubu by any chance?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Yes?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Regarding my focus, Benjamin Lesage, is his middle name Oscar?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: You said that I had one more focus that I could connect with through Samarkand besides those I listed. Were you referring to Benjamin Lesage?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Was Lesage’s middle name that I got confused with Khayyam’s first name in my last talk with you?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Yes (chuckles). That was quite a session.
ELIAS: (laughs)
JIM: Why was I so consistent in that misnaming?
ELIAS: That, my friend, is not unusual, for at times you may become fixated in one direction and in doing, so you are continuing to move your attention in one direction with association with a specific elements or individuals, and when you do that you do not allow other information and therefore it continues to be confused. In a manner of speaking, it is very similar to an action that many individuals do in attempting to listen to some expression that may not necessarily be initially clear such as a recording that may not necessarily initially be offering clear, but in their initial engagement of it they may inject certain expressions that they think are being expressed, and they continue to focus upon that although they may feel or sense that what they are hearing is incorrect they continue to reengage the recording and they hear the same expression each time.
JIM: That sure would… is what happened to me. Alright. Very good. Let’s go on. Your answers to my questions were those applicable to Oscar Khayyam though, weren’t they? [And I did it again, unknowingly substituting Oscar for Omar.]
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Alright. Do I have a focus whose name is Oscar DeLarocha?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: He is a musician?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: A pianist?
ELIAS: Yes, but he also engages other instruments.
JIM: Okay. A future focus, his life spanning the end of the shift in consciousness?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Was DeLarocha’s first name part of my confusion of Oscar for Omar Khayyam in my last talk with you?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Oscar aligns Sumari?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Soft orientation and emotional focus?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Regarding my focus, Lou Allen Knox, is he a salesman?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I get him associated with women’s undergarments. Is that what he sells, or does that impression derive from his transvestite preferences?
ELIAS: Both.
JIM: Both. Does he align Ilda?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Soft orientation and emotional focus?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: I am puzzled by a dream that I had. In the part that sticks in my mind, I started across a bridge and the bridge turned into a sort of narrow walkway extending out over water. There was no railing on the walkway and my fear of heights and falling made me turn back in panic. I don’t see any new information in this dream. I feel that I dealt with my fear of heights in the dream that ended with your introducing me to Madeline Kochs and I am aware of the influence of Henri Duvalier’s fall to his death on my emotional reaction to heights. Was this new dream of heights and panic supposed to tell me something more about myself? If so, I missed it.
ELIAS: This imagery would not necessarily center upon a fear of heights per se. That may have been an element, for that is an automatic association that you generate and therefore you would notice that. But this dream imagery is actually more associated with experiences of feeling somewhat safe and protected initially but moving further into a direction that seems to be offered although it continues to move in the same direction and in the alteration of it, it becomes more intense or more unnerving and in that, the feeling is less safety or less control.
JIM: Okay. All right. Do I have a focus named Courtney Bowles, B-O-W-L-E-S?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I believe that she is a pianist who lives in or near Birmingham, England, and who plays with their symphony orchestra as well as giving recitals on her own. Do I have that association right?
ELIAS: Yes, although it is not a female.
JIM: Oh? Oh! (enlightened) Okay. That’s interesting.
ELIAS: (laughs)
JIM: All right! Okay. In the time frame of the late 1800s or early 1900s?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Okay, then. I have she is married and has two children when it’s a he. Is he married and has two children?
ELIAS: Yes you are correct. (laughs)
JIM: (laughs) Gotta change gender here.
ELIAS: (laughs)
JIM: It’s through his influence that I respond emotionally to some piano performances such as those of Marina Tarasova’s accompanist?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I associate another Courtney with the observatory on Jupiter’s moon, Europa. Is there a Courtney Bowes, B-O-W-E-S, in that location in a 23rd or 24th century time frame?
ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.
JIM: Is it 23rd or 24th?
ELIAS: 24th.
JIM: 24th. Is she a focus of Patmae?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I got the gender right this time, didn’t I?
ELIAS: Ha, ha! Yes.
JIM: Aligns Milumet, soft orientation, emotional focus?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: She is an astrophysicist associated with Lunar University?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: She is a member of an exploration team investigating a gravitational anomaly below Europa’s surface?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Bettina Larch and George Forda are also members of that team?
ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.
JIM: The other team member is Burt Langley?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Is his first name spelled B-U-R-T or B-E-R-T?
ELIAS: B-U-R-T.
JIM: B-U. Okay. He is a focus of Allaine?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Aligns Ilda, common orientation, thought focused?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: The investigation team discovers an avian species living in a cavern carved in rock beneath Europa’s surface?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: The avians’ species name translates approximately as Tathan, T-A-T-H-A-N?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: The Tathans are the intelligent avians who co-existed with early man on Earth, as mentioned by Seth?
ELIAS: Briefly.
JIM: Briefly. They departed Earth for another dimension, ceding Earth to humans, but left a small group in this dimension living in the cavern on Europa?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Their purpose in creating the Europa settlement was to reestablish contact with humans when human technology had progressed sufficiently for the contact to occur?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Members of the investigation team discover individuals among the Tathans who are other focuses of their essences?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: The name of Courtney’s Tathan focus translates approximately as Shikit, S-H-I-K-I-T?
ELIAS: Yes, that would be correct.
JIM: The name of Langley’s Tathan focus translates approximately as Ayaya, A-Y-A-Y-A?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: A focus of Bevan among the Tathans has a name that translates approximately as Toshisa, T-O-S-H-I-S-A?
ELIAS: Correct
JIM: The team finds another intelligent species living with the Tathans?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I depicted them as shape-shifters. Are they?
ELIAS: To an extent, yes.
JIM: Their natural form is chimpanzee-like?
ELIAS: Similar.
JIM: Similar. They serve as hands for the Tathans, taking care of actions that require manual manipulation?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: I get their species name as translating approximately as Senial, S-E-N-I-A-L, but I’m uneasy about that. Am I close?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: It is Senial?
ELIAS: Yes. Remember this is a translation.
JIM: A translation.
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Courtney discovers a member of that species who is a focus of Patmae and whose name translates approximately as Murten, M-U-R-T-E-N?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Langley’s focus among the members of that species has a name that translates approximately as Lishis, L-I-S-H-I-S?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Courtney and Langley refuse recall to Lunar University and decide to live with the Tathans and Senials?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: My impression is that shape-shifters have learned how to project form image energy that differs from their natural form image energy. Is that a reasonable impression?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: This ability was initially a defensive mechanism, but later was treated as an art form?
ELIAS: You are correct.
JIM: I don’t think that the shape-shifter focus of Esilia that I asked you about is of the same species as those living with the Tathans on Europa. My impression is that Esilia’s shape-shifter’s species occupy a different dimension than the dimension from which the Europa species came. Do I have that right?
ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.
JIM: Why do I keep coming up with the name, Gilgamish? I assume that he is a focus of mine. Is he?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: What I am getting about him is that he is Irish, possibly a brigand or pirate. I think pirate because I have him associated with ships.
ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.
JIM: This would be in the late 1700s or early 1800s?
ELIAS: Seventeen hundreds.
JIM: Seventeen hundreds. Does he sail out of Martinique or am I confusing him with Henri Duvalier?
ELIAS: You are confusing the two.
JIM: Okay. I suspect that his beliefs and associations are considerably in opposition to my own preferences. Is that the case?
ELIAS: Ha, ha! Quite so.
JIM: Quite so. Was the bald head that I visualized in a cube of some sort…was that him?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: He aligns Vold, common orientation, intermediate focus?
ELIAS: Yes. [Faulty question. I don’t know what Elias agreed to here. I’ll have to ask in another session.]
JIM: Is Santiago the surname of essence Liam’s Brother Jupiter focus?
ELIAS: Clarify.
JIM: Well, essence Liam has a Brother Jupiter, right…Juniper…Juniper, excuse me…[unintelligible]. All right, is Santiago the surname of essence Liam’s Brother Juniper focus?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Does essence Lirin, L-I-R-I-N, belong Borledim?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: I was wondering why CJ Jacobson seems more influential in my life than Thomas Jollen since they were both involved with railroads. What I suspect is that CJ’s involvement with his locomotive was emotional, an iron horse, so to speak, whereas Jollen regarded a locomotive as a machine, the same as his saw mill. Have I assessed this correctly?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I’m curious about something. It involves speed of doing something. When I want to do something…move an arm to pick up something, for example…that action proceeds at a certain rate. If, however, I sense something about to occur that I wish to avoid, my speed of reaction is so swift that it amazes me. Would you care to explain that difference?
ELIAS: It is a concentration of energy and also more of a focus concentration. When you are generating a mundane action, many times you are incorporating automatic [act?]. You are not actually genuinely paying attention or being present in the action. But, if you sense some energy of an experience that you want to avoid, you become more concentrated and focused. And in that, you generate more of a concentration of energy and you manipulate energy intentionally and in doing so you can exact the action much more swiftly.
JIM: Ah! Oh, yeah, okay. I can see that. Yes, that’s very good. Thank you. I got confused between essence Zelda and essence Zitha in trying to get Paula Manion’s essence name. I think that was because of Zelda Ionescu whom you have confirmed is a focus of Zitha. Paula was born in Hungary and Zelda in Romania and both emigrated from their country of birth, which, aside from their both being Balkan natives, associates them in a way. In any case, I think Paula is also a focus of Zitha. Am I right?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Does Paula align Ilda?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Common orientation and emotional focus?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: Paula’s decision to visit us led me to try to access information about her. Did that work the other way also, in that Paula’s decision was prompted by my desire to sort out information about her?
ELIAS: Yes, somewhat.
JIM: Somewhat. Is Zitha observing or directing essence of Hungarian composer Bela Bartok?
ELIAS: Observing.
JIM: Observing. My wife and I were not really looking forward to the proposed visit from her son and his wife. Did that reluctance have anything to do with the need for expensive repairs to their van which caused cancellation of their trip?
ELIAS: Partly.
JIM: All right. Did I cause my Microsoft Word program to insert lines of asterisks in my story document that I was writing in a way that I couldn’t get rid of just so that I wouldn’t feel compelled to continue that particular story in that time frame?
ELIAS: Yes. (laughs) Quite effective.
JIM: Yes, quite effective. (laughs) Did my reluctance have to do with anything in the story itself or was there some other reason?
ELIAS: It was not necessarily the story itself, but engaging a direction of allowing yourself to temporarily disengage from that story to allow yourself a time frame where to access new creativity.
JIM: Very good, yes.
ELIAS: And new information.
JIM: Right. Does essence Tehuti belong Milumet?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Is Paul Sorenson a focus of essence Anne, A-N-N-E?
ELIAS: Observing.
JIM: Observing. I’m going to get his essence name eventually.
ELIAS: (laughs heartily)
JIM: Is Letty Hastings a focus of Mubu?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: I finally got her. Okay. It seems to me that, as I become objectively aware of other of my focuses, that the intensity of energy exchange between us should either intensify or become more directed or both, whether the other focus is objectively aware of me or not. Is that the case?
ELIAS: To an extent, yes.
JIM: Okay. In cases, such as with Senta Willings and Madeline Kochs, where another focus is objectively aware of me as I am of them, in what way does that common knowledge affect our energy exchange?
ELIAS: It becomes a curiosity, and in that it does affect the energy exchange for it generates it to be easier.
JIM: Ah, okay, yes. All right. Are the wild mood swings that I am currently experiencing an effect of the energy of the perception wave?
ELIAS: Partially, yes, and partially associated with your action of connecting with other focuses and in that how you emotionally connect with other focuses.
JIM: Okay. I’ve been thinking about my objective willing of supportive energy to other focuses. Is this a subjective action regardless of my objective willing of it? That was supposed to be a positive statement.
ELIAS: (laughs) It is both.
JIM: Both.
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Okay. It seems to me that I should be able to will this sort of support more directly following disengagement. Will that be the case?
ELIAS: Perhaps. Although I would express that you are becoming quite accomplished at this action now. But perhaps, depending upon what you choose subsequent to disengaging you may be becoming even more accomplished at this action if you are so choosing.
JIM: I think I will be so choosing.
ELIAS: (laughs)
JIM: All right. In making no effort to counter deterioration of the condition of my physical body, I suspect that I am honoring a belief that if I don’t do something about it, my objective life will drag on. Is that my operative belief?
ELIAS: Clarify this.
JIM: Boy! Um, I’m not sure how to clarify that. Let’s just skip it. Maybe I can figure it out.
ELIAS: (laughs)
JIM: If my intuitive connection of the number 84 with my disengagement was “accurate” as you said, then, assuming that number applies to age, I guess that I have another year to go. You said it was a matter of choice, but apparently my choice is to disengage probable selves like a snake sheds skins. Is my belief in age-84 disengagement keeping me alive?
ELIAS: Partially, but you also incorporate other influences, motivations in your [collections?] and what you are doing presently that continue to generate a curiosity within you and that continues to generate a value fulfillment.
JIM: Okay. Did I disengage another probable self recently…a few days before this talk with you? I felt as though I did.
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Do you sense the rage I feel in response to still being alive?
ELIAS: Somewhat.
JIM: Somewhat.
ELIAS: At times, for it is not continuous.
JIM: No, it is not continuous.
ELIAS: But, yes, I would acknowledge that, but also I would acknowledge that it is not constant and that your curiosity matches it quite well.
JIM: (laughs) [Now, on a scale?]
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes. (both laugh)
JIM: All right. Okay. When you said that Bevan originated the future change in date designation from using a religious myth time frame for a base to using the time frame of the end-of-shift of consciousness as a base, did that thought actually originate with me as a focus of Bevan?
ELIAS: Yes,
JIM: Gee whiz!
ELIAS: (laughs)
JIM: Okay. When, earlier this year, I asked if the number of Bevan focuses in this dimension was 1527, you said there were more. My impression is that the number is now 1534. Am I close?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: It is 1534.
ELIAS: Presently, yes.
JIM: Presently, yes…until the next second or two, huh?
ELIAS: (laughs)
JIM: Has my widened awareness of and interactions with other focuses of Bevan influenced, in any way, this more or less steady increase in number of Bevan focuses in this dimension?
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes, for it has [offered?] for the increased curiosity.
JIM: Right. Okay. I now recognize that it was Marina Tarasova’s influence that prompted me to try to learn to play the cello much too late in life to accomplish mastery of the instrument. I think that I allowed Marina’s influence to assist me during one Christmas season when my wife was playing carols on the piano. I sat down with my cello and accompanied her for what turned out to be a duet that brought tears to my mother-in-law’s eyes. I didn’t objectively know of Marina or even of Elias in that time frame and I’m sure that Marina had no knowledge of me, yet I feel sure the perfection of that duet was Marina’s influence. The only way I can explain being able to play the cello that well is that Marina projected energy to me. Is that what happened?
ELIAS: And you drew it.
JIM: I drew it.
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Okay. Did I assist…well… Wait a minute… She projected it and I drew it. Is that what you’re saying?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Okay. All right. Did I assist Marina in selecting the time/space coordinates for that energy projection as I did in the case of Muriel’s energy projection?
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes.
JIM: As with Muriel, the projection was a post-disengagement event, wasn’t it?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: Is Robert Matthews, M-A-T-T-E-W-S, that Michael, focus of Rajheen, finds so much like himself…is Robert a focus of Rajheen?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: He is. How about the rock guitarist, Malmsteem, that Michael admires? Is he a focus of Rajheen also?
ELIAS: Yes.
JIM: From what Michael writes, I suspect that the drag queen that he meets in dreams is also a focus of his. Am I right?
ELIAS: Correct.
JIM: That’s three focuses of his. I suspect that my sexual dysfunction is more due to beliefs than to age. Am I right?
ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.
JIM: Because of the interwoven nature of my beliefs, I believe that they are very difficult to realign. Is that a valid assessment or am I using that as an excuse for not attempting realignment?
ELIAS: Both.
JIM: Both. Okay.
ELIAS: I would express to you a validation of your initial impression that your beliefs are strong and that would generate some difficulty, but you also do incorporate that as a viable excuse to not engage the effort.
JIM: Right. Okay. That’s what I was afraid of.
ELIAS: (laughs)
JIM: All right. That winds up my question list, Elias. I didn’t use as much time as I expected. But it’s great talking with you.
ELIAS: (laughs) As always, my friend, I enjoy our conversation and your energy. (chuckles)
JIM: Well, I certainly enjoy your energy.
ELIAS: (laughs) And I shall be greatly acknowledging of you in your accomplishments in your endeavors in connecting.
JIM: Thank you.
ELIAS: (chuckles)
JIM: I’m trying real hard.
ELIAS: Ha, ha! You are not trying, you are doing and you are succeeding. Ha, ha, ha, ha.
JIM: Thank you.
ELIAS: I shall be anticipating our next meeting, my dear friend. In great appreciation to you and in expressing my energy continuously in encouragement. Au revoir.
JIM: Au revoir. Thank you very much.
Copyright 2007 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.